<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.8.3 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:44:15 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>lisalapeery.com - a portal for info about Sudan</title><link>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 04:41:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.8.3 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics"/><item><title>American Idol scandal, you say?</title><dc:creator>Lisala</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:29:36 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/2008/5/1/american-idol-scandal-you-say.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24599:169029:1803531</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Are we really so desperate that every little thing is a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/arts/television/01idol.html?no_interstitial" target="_blank">scandal</a>? Earlier this week, Paula Abdul flubbed when she critiqued a performance that hadn't taken place. Today various news sources say Ms. Abdul admitted the judges view the rehearsals and pre-prepare some feedback based on the non-televised performances.</p><p>Is this really a scandal? Exxon is STILL posting profits while I pay $50 to fill half of my Pontiac Aztek's gas tank, all kinds of lies are still flying about with regard to the wars we're involved with and the democratic primaries are being dragged on and on and on while a verbose preacher is not being looked at as having an agenda against my favorite Presidential candidate, Barack Obama, and the scandal of the day is that Paula Abdul can't read her own notes properly. </p><p>wtf?</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/rss-comments-entry-1803531.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Snippets</title><dc:creator>Lisala</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/2008/4/29/snippets.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24599:169029:1798540</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Who pays Rev. Wright?</strong> He sure is making sure Barack Obama loses the presidential nomination with all this talking he's doing. I read on the Huffington Post Hillary Clinton's backers supporters for his engagement at the National Press Conference yesterday. How surprising.</p><p>&nbsp;<strong>Who minds Miley? </strong>I honestly thought these recent pics  of Miley Cyrus in Vanity Fair, barebacked and all, were pretty. She looks&nbsp; like&nbsp; a&nbsp; cherub, in the face. Otherwise, she needs&nbsp; to eat!&nbsp;&nbsp; Whoever&nbsp; takes care&nbsp; of her&nbsp; is doing a crappy job , putting&nbsp; her in &quot;embarrassing&quot; situations and denying her food. FEED HER and get her some&nbsp; responsible guardians.</p><p><br />&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/rss-comments-entry-1798540.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Hillary misspoke</title><dc:creator>Lisala</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:42:34 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/2008/3/25/hillary-misspoke.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24599:169029:1714499</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>First, let me say&nbsp;I am so over this election. I know who I'm voting for. The rest of this is just fodder. The issues important to you and I, like the housing situation, job losses, the security of our freedoms, the value of the dollar, who is going to watch the kids after school... none of this is being discussed.</p><p>And to top it off, Mrs. Clinton is having a memory problem or delusions of dodging bullets incorrectly. I dont' even have the patience to finish this post. Let me just say that if I told an employer I worked somewhere I never set foot in, or if i stated I was an employee where I was a temp worker, I'd be doubted and fired, and have a tough time getting rehired. So would you. Why should Hillary be any different?</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/rss-comments-entry-1714499.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Britney, Britney, Britney</title><dc:creator>Lisala</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:27:11 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/2008/3/25/britney-britney-britney.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24599:169029:1714455</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>So it's all about britney and her &quot;comeback&quot; move playing&nbsp;a role on the tv sitcom <em>How I Met Your Mother</em>. Hopefully, if we leave her alone, she can stay healthy and do whatever she darn well pleases without the prying eyes of the media watching. I've got high hopes for her.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/rss-comments-entry-1714455.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Soldier's Story</title><dc:creator>Lisala</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:11:02 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/2008/3/20/soldiers-story.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24599:169029:1701591</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>During the past five years we've heard the protests and arguments against the war, we've seen the headlines about troops suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and suicides. I have not seen an account as detailed and compelling that gave me a sense of what it's really like working the Army's medical system though. This story, from the Denver Westword <a href="http://www.westword.com/2008-03-20/news/the-good-soldier/">says it all</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/rss-comments-entry-1701591.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The Michigan vote</title><dc:creator>Lisala</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:06:31 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/2008/3/20/the-michigan-vote.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24599:169029:1701486</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>So Hillary Clinton wants to hold a re-vote in Michigan, where Barack Obama's name wasn't on the ballot and nobody voted for him. Obama has said that splitting the votes between the two candidates evenly is the most fair resolution, while Clinton pushed forward trying to get a re-vote. Clinton's argument is that by not having a re-vote, Obama is saying Michigan voters have no voice and their votes don't count.</p><p>Don't get sucked in! Obama didn't set the rules, the Democratic National Convention did. The DNC said any elections before Feb. 5th won't count, and the state held their elections on January 15th. If the voters have a problem with the process, it needs to be addressed with the state&nbsp;legislators. Mrs. Clinton needs to fault the right people and stop confusing the electorate. She needs to stop using the tactics employed by her opponents on the right, stop grasping at straws, and either fight with a fair campaign or dropout, in my never to be humble opinion.</p><p>If you're totally confused about the issue, check out this <a href="http://lisala.squarespace.com/%20Per%20Ms.%20Gaughan%20routing%20ticket%20to%20Local%20TSS.">article</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/rss-comments-entry-1701486.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Vatican extends the list of sins</title><dc:creator>Lisala</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:54:34 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/2008/3/10/vatican-extends-the-list-of-sins.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24599:169029:1669110</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>They now include not recycling and other bad deeds with environmental and social ramifications. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23557650/" target="_blank">Here it is</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/rss-comments-entry-1669110.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Re-vote Update</title><dc:creator>Lisala</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:03:10 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/2008/3/6/re-vote-update.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24599:169029:1647649</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Voters may re-vote</strong> in Michigan and Florida; Howard Dean is apparently<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23499719/" target="_blank"> pushing for another vote </a>sans all the original candidates, but the Democratic National Committee is not paying for it.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/rss-comments-entry-1647649.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Do-over voting in FL,MI not democratic</title><dc:creator>Lisala</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:50:27 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/2008/3/6/do-over-voting-in-flmi-not-democratic.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24599:169029:1646192</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Back in January Florida and Michigan held primary elections, but they were not on the Democratic National Committee's calendar. Presidential candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton did not campaign in either state, and Obama was not listed on the MI ballot. No delegates were awarded to either candidate. Now that Clinton [somehow] won OH &amp; TX&nbsp; this past Tuesday, there's chatter of <a href="http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/03/dnc_encouraging_florida_and_mi.php" target="_blank">another vote </a>in both states.</p><p>Both states changed the dates they would hold their primaries, which violates the DNC rules. As a result, the DNC stripped the candidates' right to pick up delegates. Understandable. You broke the rules so you don't get to play. Very democratic.&nbsp;</p><p>The problem? In January there were more candidates! John Edwards and Dennis Kucinich would have a lot to squawk about if there were another vote since they too lost an opportunity to pick up delegates. Voters would have something to protest over for the fact that they lost an opportunity&nbsp; to vote for the candidates they believe in most. Not democratic. </p><p>So far, DNC chairman Howard Dean (yah!) is standing his ground, saying everyone knew the rules. Only Clinton's campaign is calling for a re-vote. </p><p>This mess underlines why I am an Obama faithful. We're only in the primary season and the Clinton camp is like a three-year-old throwing a fit because they can't have the toy they want. Misleading attack ads got her ahead in OH and TX, Now she's trying to increase her lead by breaking the rules. Sets things up nicely for another Republican White House. It also shows us what to expect from her as president - a tyrant type who does whatever she wants regardless of rules or the good of the country. What makes Clinton as President any different than what we've had the last 8 years?<br /></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/rss-comments-entry-1646192.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Great Knight! and other stuff</title><dc:creator>Lisala</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:50:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/2008/3/5/great-knight-and-other-stuff.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24599:169029:1640962</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Winningest coach turns critic </strong>as ESPN has just hired <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=3269476" target="_blank">Bobby Knight as an</a>&nbsp;analyst during the college basketball playoffs. I'll be watching. Should be fun. College b-ball has been lacking without Mr. Knight, who gave us some gems for quotes, like this one: &quot;When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want them to bury me upside down, so my critics can kiss my ass.&quot;</p><p><strong>On the OH, TX primary</strong> I dropped the ball. I should have been blogging to get out the Barack Obama vote and probably recruiting voters too, but I was lax. What I don't get is this: the Dems I know in OH and TX claimed to support Obama. The conservatives I know in both places support Ron Paul. So how did neither win? Just a curious thing. Hopefully, Obama will pull through ultimately. So if you haven't voted yet, and you're voting the Democratic ticket, vote for Obama. I'll opine on why in a bit.</p><p>Now I understand that several right-wing radio talk-show hosts were calling for everyone to vote for Hillary Clinton, but I have a hard time believing people did. Not enough to create the &quot;landslide&quot; victories she had in the two states. For a Republican to vote for a Democrat in a primary election&nbsp;means that the voter who switches forgoes the right to select their representatives for the other elected seats; county commissioners, judges, clerks of courts, sheriffs, prosecutors, ... if you voted yesterday you know the list. Local officials have a lot more impact on everyday living than the president, and it's difficult to believe that one would pass all of that up to vote for one person whom they despise. </p><p><strong>Cleveland mayors have turned coat</strong> and proven my last post wrong. Four local mayors switched parties. Read about it <a href="http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/2008/03/pattonmulcahy.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://lisala.squarespace.com/in-the-news/rss-comments-entry-1640962.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>